6m agoCummins rules out taking any legal action
45m agoCummins says it seems the issue has been ‘sitting heavy’ on Khawaja
1h ago‘There was no master plan around using illegal methods’
1h agoPat Cummins says Khawaja’s claim ‘complete and utter nonsense’
1h agoA quick recap of how we got here ...
Cummins says he was “genuinely shocked” this week amid the comments in Khawaja’s book. He went on:
When he says we all knew, if [by] that he means we knew sandpaper was going out on the field, he’s 100% wrong. I said that consistently for the last eight years. I did not know that was happening … He says that I and others were architects of a scheme to ball-tamper with sandpaper. That’s complete and utter nonsense.
When he says we all knew, if [by] that he means we knew sandpaper was going out on the field, he’s 100% wrong. I said that consistently for the last eight years. I did not know that was happening …
He says that I and others were architects of a scheme to ball-tamper with sandpaper. That’s complete and utter nonsense.
Cummins goes on to say he believes Khawaja’s book has “been casual with my [life] and the lives of many others, and I think Australian cricket”.
‘Hopefully … we can move on to more fun topics like actual cricket’
Cummins is done. He says he hopes the de facto question time will put an end to the episode:
Hopefully today we put a line through it and we can move on to much more fun topics, like actual cricket starting this afternoon.
Cummins won’t be taking any legal action. He says:
I mean, I did get advised this week that some of the things that have [been] said are probably defamatory. I won’t be doing that. You got to move on. It’s been eight years. We’re moving on, we are moving on. You got to draw the line at some point. I won’t be doing that.
I mean, I did get advised this week that some of the things that have [been] said are probably defamatory. I won’t be doing that. You got to move on. It’s been eight years.
We’re moving on, we are moving on. You got to draw the line at some point. I won’t be doing that.
‘Maybe we should have done a better job of explaining’
Cummins maintains he will stay until the questions finish, noting the presser has gone on for over an hour. He adds:
Maybe we should have done a better job of explaining over the years. Perhaps the public does deserve it. We are Australian property. But it is a really difficult one.
Cummins: ‘there’s a lot of nuance’ in what bowlers do to the ball
Cummins is speaking now about the nuance of ball politics.
The details matter because I can totally understand if you hear and have a passing interest in cricket and you see that sandpaper has been taken on to the field; I can see why it is jarring. There’s a huge spectrum here of right and wrong, but there’s a lot of nuance. You are allowed to shine a ball. You are allowed to apply saliva. Not any more, but you were. But you cannot apply too much, you cannot load it up. … There’s a lot of nuance and we take each extreme, I will shine it with a bit of saliva and maybe I have some sugar in my mouth. You can see how the boundaries get pushed a bit.
The details matter because I can totally understand if you hear and have a passing interest in cricket and you see that sandpaper has been taken on to the field; I can see why it is jarring.
There’s a huge spectrum here of right and wrong, but there’s a lot of nuance. You are allowed to shine a ball. You are allowed to apply saliva. Not any more, but you were. But you cannot apply too much, you cannot load it up.
… There’s a lot of nuance and we take each extreme, I will shine it with a bit of saliva and maybe I have some sugar in my mouth. You can see how the boundaries get pushed a bit.
Cummins: cricket now ‘in a much better spot’
Cummins is getting asked a lot of detailed questions about the episode, but he says some of the fine-tuned inquiries are difficult to speak to as they took place almost a decade ago.
This is a hard thing to talk about because a lot of what we are referring to is eight and a half years ago and was dealt with, and I think the world is a better place for going through it. I think it’s in a much better spot.
Cummins: Test series at centre of sandpaper scandal took place in ‘lawless’ era
We’re still going.
Cummins says the past series at the centre of the initial controversy took place during a “lawless” era.
“I’m glad we have not seen a series like that since,” he says.
This press conference is approaching 45 minutes. Cummins says he’ll stay until journalists had exhausted all of their questions, and then hopefully move on permanently from the rehashed controversy.
Cummins won’t say much about any exchanges he’s had with Khawaja this week, saying they’re personal conversations and he doesn’t want to “go into it”.
When asked why he thinks the revelations are coming out now, Cummins says:
It looks like it’s been sitting heavy on him for a while. It’s eight and a half years ago. I get that … Maybe this is Usman’s chance and he never really got over it at the time.
But he reiterates that he believes the claims are “irresponsible”.
Cummins said he’s been frustrated Khawaja’s book is relitigating an episode from more than eight years ago, adding it had reopened trauma for some:
It’s eight and a half years, we have moved on. We’ll keep saying it but, again, these are people’s lives. It was traumatic for some of them. They have had to work through quite a bit to get out the other side. So again, that’s why I’m really disappointed and frustrated this week … how it’s been dealt with so flippantly.
It’s eight and a half years, we have moved on.
We’ll keep saying it but, again, these are people’s lives. It was traumatic for some of them. They have had to work through quite a bit to get out the other side.
So again, that’s why I’m really disappointed and frustrated this week … how it’s been dealt with so flippantly.
Cummins says there’s a ‘proper way to do things’
Cummins says he believes there was a proper way to handle the sandpaper incident, pointing to the Cricket Australia investigation shortly afterwards.
Cricket Australia’s chief executive, Todd Greenberg, told media this week there was not “any compelling reason” to revisit the investigation, even though there are “specific details” in Khawaja’s book “that contradict the versions that have been provided by others”.
There’s a very proper way to do things and improve. I think that investigation was a proper way to do it. Everyone was asked in the circumstances about a game very quickly after. So that’s for CA. I think you can maybe argue whether the judgements were fair, but what can you do? I got asked all the questions, answered them all fairly.
There’s a very proper way to do things and improve. I think that investigation was a proper way to do it.
Everyone was asked in the circumstances about a game very quickly after. So that’s for CA. I think you can maybe argue whether the judgements were fair, but what can you do? I got asked all the questions, answered them all fairly.
‘I think he’s wrong’, Cummins says
A reporter just asked about the difference in stories. Cummins replied:
That’s my story, so I think he’s wrong.
He went on to say there appeared to be a “few big leaps” in the book and Khawaja had been “vague” and acted in a “very casual matter”:
The details really matter in that difference. So perhaps there was conversations with Cameron Bancroft around taking sandpaper out and how to do it. That doesn’t mean that everyone in that dressing room knew what was going on.
There was no master plan around using illegal methods. I think that’s maybe something that hasn’t been spoken about enough. People assume you have gone from very legal methods to suddenly taking sandpaper and then there must have been some huge master plan. That is not the case … There’s no grand plan, there’s no team meeting, there’s no bowlers saying ‘this is what must happen’.
There was no master plan around using illegal methods. I think that’s maybe something that hasn’t been spoken about enough. People assume you have gone from very legal methods to suddenly taking sandpaper and then there must have been some huge master plan.
That is not the case …
There’s no grand plan, there’s no team meeting, there’s no bowlers saying ‘this is what must happen’.
Cummins: ‘I did not see anything on the ball’
Cummins was asked how the ball looked at the time.
At that stage, you know, even the umpires had a look. We didn’t know it had been altered with sandpaper. Balls get roughened up every time we play. So, you know, whether that’s from a foreign object or something that’s totally legal and part of the game. Sometimes it’s hard to know. But out there in the field I did not see anything on the ball.
At that stage, you know, even the umpires had a look. We didn’t know it had been altered with sandpaper.
Balls get roughened up every time we play. So, you know, whether that’s from a foreign object or something that’s totally legal and part of the game. Sometimes it’s hard to know. But out there in the field I did not see anything on the ball.
Cummins is fronting the media now.
Khawaja memoir ‘readable, surprisingly revealing, sometimes painfully frank’
Gideon Haigh, writing for the Guardian this week, says the greatest shame of the controversy inflamed by Usman Khawaja’s memoir, Sabr, is that “99% of those opining about it will never read it”.
They will experience it by quotes and summaries, magnified and distorted, elided and exaggerated, shaped by voyeurism and schadenfreude. In fact, Sabr is a readable, surprisingly revealing, sometimes painfully frank book about a unique career.
They will experience it by quotes and summaries, magnified and distorted, elided and exaggerated, shaped by voyeurism and schadenfreude.
In fact, Sabr is a readable, surprisingly revealing, sometimes painfully frank book about a unique career.
Haigh says Khawaja was among the most talented batters in an Australian generation “when it was not in oversupply”, but points out he played in only 22% of the national team’s total fixtures over that period.
If he developed a carapace to deal with such endless disappointment, should that surprise anyone? Sabr might mean patience or resilience in Urdu, but a strength of Khawaja’s testament is that he allows the impatience to show through. It is a cranky book because, perhaps, a degree of crankiness is what it takes to come back and back and back, when one is never sure one’s abilities are appreciated and one’s face fits.
If he developed a carapace to deal with such endless disappointment, should that surprise anyone?
Sabr might mean patience or resilience in Urdu, but a strength of Khawaja’s testament is that he allows the impatience to show through.
It is a cranky book because, perhaps, a degree of crankiness is what it takes to come back and back and back, when one is never sure one’s abilities are appreciated and one’s face fits.
