The Supreme Court has granted two weeks to the Assam government to file its responses on pleas challenging orders declaring five women as foreigners who allegedly entered the state illegally.

.

Can a person be declared a foreigner without a fair hearing? | Explained "As prayed, two weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the respondent—State of Assam to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit(s) in all the cases.

List after two weeks," the Bench said in its July 16 order.

On June 5, the top court had ordered status quo on the deportation of the petitioners while agreeing to hear their pleas challenging separate orders of the Gauhati High Court.

During the hearing on Thursday (July 16, 2026), an advocate appearing for one of the petitioners referred to a July 13 verdict of the apex court, which held that the determination of citizenship status must be made through a fair, lawful and reasoned process.

Fair, reasoned process must decide citizenship: Supreme Court Another advocate appearing for some petitioners said two of the women were in detention and the top court had stayed their deportation by ordering status quo in the matter.

The counsel appearing for the Assam government sought two weeks to file replies, which was granted by the Bench.

The Gauhati High Court had earlier rejected the pleas filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the orders passed by the Foreigners Tribunals declaring them foreigners or illegal migrants who had illegally entered India from Bangladesh.

Assam district orders deportation of man declared foreigner In its July 13 verdict on a batch of separate appeals arising out of the proceedings before the Foreigners Tribunals in Assam and the erstwhile Illegal Migrants (Determination) Tribunals, the apex court had set aside the high court judgments which affirmed the orders declaring certain persons as foreigners.

Assam labourer shows 15 documents but fails citizenship test in High Court The top court had asked the tribunals concerned to decide the references afresh, uninfluenced by any earlier observation by the high court or by the tribunals.

It had said the State has a legitimate and compelling interest in ensuring that persons who are not legally entitled to claim Indian citizenship do not secure such status by misuse of process, by false claims or by taking advantage of procedural delays.

"At the same time, the determination of such status must be made through a process which is fair, lawful and reasoned," the top court had said.