Updated on: Oct 15, 2026, 13:14:35 IST By Utkarsh Anand Prefer HTon Google Share via Copy link The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice to the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the three election commissioners on a petition filed by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and 12 other INDIA bloc leaders seeking an independent inquiry into alleged electoral irregularities and the functioning of the poll panel.
Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra during ‘March for Democracy’ by INDIA bloc leaders to the Supreme Court, to file a petition against CEC in New Delhi on October 12, 2026. (RAJ K RAJ /HT PHOTO) A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, however, issued a provisional notice in respect of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) leader Mahua Maji – a co-petitioner in the same petition -- taking exception to some statements made by Maji.
“Respondent no.
9 will have to explain her statements and conduct,” the bench clarified.
The petition, which seeks a time-bound investigation into allegations that chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar took several decisions unilaterally, also calls for suspending the ongoing special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls pending an independent inquiry.
The INDIA bloc leaders have contended that the alleged exercise of collective powers by a single member of the ECI raises questions about compliance with the Constitution and the law governing the functioning of the three-member body.
Congress leader and party president Mallikarjun Kharge, the Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, over their concerns regarding the SIR exercise and the functioning of the ECI.
The CJI had instead indicated that their concerns could be raised through appropriate judicial proceedings.
Gandhi personally approached the Supreme Court registry on Monday to file the petition, joined by Kharge and leaders of other INDIA bloc parties in a show of opposition unity.
The plea was initially held up after the registry flagged 14 defects, including a shortfall of ₹220 in court fees, an illegible photocopy of Kharge’s identity card and missing vakalatnamas for nine petitioners.
The petitioners have clarified that they are not seeking to reopen the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the validity of the SIR exercise in Bihar.
Instead, they want the court to examine whether individual decisions taken during its implementation complied with constitutional and statutory safeguards governing the functioning of the ECI.
Sandhu and Vivek Joshi objected to Kumar’s alleged unilateral decision-making on 14 occasions over 10 months, the petition seeks production of the complete files, agendas, minutes, notings and objections recorded by the two commissioners on disputed decisions, including the June 2025 decision to undertake the SIR exercise.
The petition also seeks an independent committee headed by a retired Supreme Court judge, with technical experts and civil society members, to examine the poll panel’s decisions, policies, procedures and technical architecture relating to electronic voting machines.
Among its other grievances, the plea questions the alleged modification of statutory Form 6 without amending the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, the centralised functioning of the ECINET and ERONET electoral-roll databases, and the exclusion of eligible voters without adequate notice, hearing or an effective mechanism for restoration.
The opposition leaders have argued that the independence and collective functioning of the ECI are integral to free and fair elections, a feature of the Constitution’s basic structure.
They have sought appropriate action against those responsible for any breach of the constitutional or statutory provisions governing electoral-roll preparation and revision.
The petition, filed through advocate S Prasanna, names the ECI, Kumar, Sandhu and Joshi as respondents.
Operating round the clock, the desk brings together experienced editors, reporters and correspondents to deliver fast, accurate and contextual reporting across subjects that influence public policy, governance, business, society and international affairs.
The HT News Desk covers politics, elections, government policies, the economy, business and markets, science and technology, the environment, law and order, infrastructure, education, climate issues and geopolitics, while closely tracking developments across states, institutions and global capitals.
The team also leads coverage of major breaking news events, policy announcements, court proceedings, natural disasters, public emergencies and significant international developments.
Reports published by the newsdesk are based on information gathered from reporters on the ground, official statements, government agencies, court records, regulatory filings, recognised institutions and other authoritative sources.
Stories undergo editorial scrutiny and verification processes to ensure accuracy, fairness and relevance, and are updated as events evolve and additional information becomes available.
