A speculative scenario for Europeans titled “Europe 2031” has taken the internet by storm.

Reportedly written by eight people describing themselves as a small group of AI researchers, think-tank experts, and investors with a deep understanding of AI and European policy, the document has sparked widespread debate.

The viral piece begins with an apocalyptic ending before working backwards to explain how events unfolded.

The fact that the main body of the text, produced by Brussels-based thinkers, was published just a day before the Trump administration reportedly decided to block “foreign nationals” from accessing Anthropic’s much-hyped AI models has only added to its relevance.

The text has reportedly become so influential that even members of the European Parliament have read and discussed it.

More from Tech ‘Mythos’ and ‘Fable’ deliver a reality check: India needs AI sovereignty and supply-chain resilience No hugs with Trump, PM Modi’s subtle message to US… What unfolded at the G7 summit in France Similar speculative exercises have attracted significant attention in the past.

In 2025, “AI 2027” explored the possibility of an AI system becoming superintelligent and ultimately causing humanity’s extinction.

Some observers have also pointed out that several major projects referenced in the document’s depiction of American AI dominance have already run into trouble.

The $100 billion OpenAI-Nvidia deal, billed as the biggest AI agreement of last year, reportedly collapsed in February.

Questions are also being raised about OpenAI’s proposed $300 billion arrangement with Oracle, as the company continues to spend heavily on data centre expansion while remaining deeply unprofitable.

While readers remain divided over the text’s conclusions, its authors appear relatively sanguine.

According to The Guardian, they have emphasized that their goal was not to make precise predictions, but rather to convey “a general feel for a version of what we think will happen.” Quick Reads View All AI bubble could be more painful than dot-com crash, warns valuation expert Aswath Damodaran India's space economy is taking off — and states want a bigger share of the opportunity The Brussels-based NGO behind the project is neither an advocacy organization nor a venture-backed startup, and it does not publicly disclose its funding sources.

Nevertheless, the sudden surge in popularity of the text has helped strengthen arguments for greater European technological sovereignty.

The recent decision by the United States to restrict European access to Anthropic’s Claude models has further reinforced the document’s central message: that Europe may ultimately need to develop and control more of its own AI infrastructure.