New York Federal Reserve President John Williams on Tuesday defended the US central bank’s framework for implementing monetary policy, while saying it could be adjusted as financial markets evolve, Reuters reported.

Providing "ample" reserves to the financial system, alongside the Fed’s existing tools for managing short-term interest rates, "has proven to be highly effective at delivering interest rate control and supporting the smooth functioning of core financial markets," Williams said in prepared opening remarks at a New York Fed conference on the Treasury market.

Williams did not discuss the outlook for monetary policy or interest rates and was not scheduled to take questions after his speech, according to Reuters report.

The New York Fed chief said the central bank’s rate-control framework had worked well but was not set in stone and could be adapted to changing market conditions.

"As markets evolve, we must ensure that policy tools are fit for purpose to carry out their necessary functions," Williams said. "Put simply, the evolution of financial market structure leads to the evolution of how we carry out monetary policy effectively."

Williams’ comments on how the Fed manages short-term interest rates to meet its inflation and employment mandates came as the central bank reviewed a range of policy issues.

Under new Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh, the central bank has established several task forces to examine how it communicates, assesses data and manages its still-large balance sheet. Before taking over as Fed chief in May, Warsh regularly criticized the central bank’s substantial asset holdings and its system of supplying significant liquidity to the financial system through reserves.

Before the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed maintained tight liquidity conditions in financial markets, but it later abandoned that approach.

Fed officials have long argued that maintaining ample liquidity in the financial system helps support financial stability. They have also said the tools used to manage liquidity provide firm control over short-term interest rates, which is central to the debate.

"There should be little or no opportunity cost to holding reserves at the central bank," Williams said. "A high opportunity cost is simply inefficient and creates other distortions that interfere with market functioning and stability."

Williams added, however, that the Fed’s approach would remain responsive to changing market conditions.

"If underlying demand for reserves shifts due to changes in regulation, market structure, or any other reason, the Federal Reserve will match that with a shift in the supply of reserves over time," he said.