UK news Russell Brand says he couldn’t find anyone to give evidence on his behalf in rape and sexual assault trial – latest updates Brand, 51, has been charged with three counts of rape, three counts of sexual assault and one count of attempted indecent assault Content warning: this article contains references to allegations of sexual abuse which some readers might find distressing LIVE Updated 5m ago Taz Ali Wed 28 Oct 2026 15.00 GMTFirst published on Wed 28 Oct 2026 10.15 GMT Share Key events 4m ago Alcohol 'makes people less effective human beings,' Brand tells court 2h ago What the court has heard so far 3h ago Brand told jurors he couldn't find anyone to give evidence on his behalf after 'devastating' Dispatches documentary 4h ago Brand tells court 'consent is more important than sex itself' 5h ago 'My entire life has been consumed by these allegations,' Brand tells court 5h ago Brand begins giving evidence 5h ago Defence to begin presenting its case in Russell Brand's trial Court artist sketch of Russell Brand being questioned by his barrister at Southwark Crown Court From 2h ago Russell Brand has denied all the allegations made against him as he took to the witness box to give evidence in his trial at Southwark crown court.
The comedian, 51, told the court that his “entire life has been consumed by these allegations”.
Brand said he struggled to find anyone to give evidence on his behalf, saying the consequences of the September 2023 investigation by the Sunday Times, Times, and Channel 4 Dispatches were “devastating”.
He told jurors that he believed consent was “fundamental, essential, necessary and, indeed, in many ways more important than sex itself”.
During cross-examination, Brand admitted he was “obsessed” with sex in his younger years but denied being unable to function without it.
He denied the accusation that he would pretend to be gay to make women trust him.
Court artist sketch of the judge, Mr Justice Bennathan, looking on as Russell Brand gives evidence at Southwark crown court.
Key events 4m ago Alcohol 'makes people less effective human beings,' Brand tells court 2h ago What the court has heard so far 3h ago Brand told jurors he couldn't find anyone to give evidence on his behalf after 'devastating' Dispatches documentary 4h ago Brand tells court 'consent is more important than sex itself' 5h ago 'My entire life has been consumed by these allegations,' Brand tells court 5h ago Brand begins giving evidence 5h ago Defence to begin presenting its case in Russell Brand's trial During cross-examination, Russell Brand told the court he believes alcohol “makes people less effective as human beings”.
A woman who alleged he raped her in a Soho bar toilet in 2004 told the court in her evidence she had drunk six or seven vodkas before encountering Brand.
When prosecutor Riel Karmy-Jones told Brand it was “obvious she had been drinking”, Brand said: “Yeah, I suppose so.” Karmy-Jones put to him that the woman was “more vulnerable”, Brand said: “I agree alcohol makes people less effective.” When the judge, Mr Justice Bennathan, interjected to ask him to clarify, Brand said: “Effective human beings.
It’s a deleterious substance.” Court artist sketch of prosecutor Riel Karmy-Jones cross-examining Russell Brand at Southwark crown court.
Brand said it was a “marvellous night” when he had a threesome with two women backstage at Hammersmith Apollo in 2009.
One of the women accused Brand of anally raping her during a second meeting at his flat a few days later.
Karmy-Jones put to him that it was an example of Brand “never leaving without a conquest” because the woman had refused to have full sex with him backstage.
Brand replied: “That actually went down as quite a marvellous night by the criteria of the time.” Brand said that “going in and out of bathrooms didn’t attract a great deal of attention” during the time of the alleged offences.
When asked by Karmy-Jones if his behaviour was “normalised” by his peers, Brand said: “In the media in the early 2000s, people going in and out of bathrooms didn’t attract a great deal of attention.” He added: “Maybe an eyeroll, eyebrow raise.” Karmy-Jones asked Brand about the woman who alleged he grabbed her breasts before pulling her into a toilet and orally raped her at a bar in Soho in 2004.
When Karmy-Jones put it to him that he groped the woman and dragged her into the toilet, he denied it.
“What were you inviting her into the toilet for?” Karmy-Jones asked.
“For fooling around,” Brand replied.
Karmy-Jones asked him if he recalled telling the woman “don’t be a spoilsport, come on” when she protested, Brand said “I don’t remember”.
The prosecutor, Riel Karmy-Jones, asked Brand about the alleged attempted indecent assault against a woman who worked at MTV in 2001, who alleged the comedian grabbed her arm and tried to drag her into a toilet.
She said to Brand if he “quite enjoyed having sex in toilets” at the time, he replied “yes”.
Karmy-Jones asked: “Sex in toilets happened a lot didn’t it?” Brand said: “Yes.” Karmy-Jones asked if he remembered there being a struggle when he grabbed the woman’s arm, he said he did not recall.
Court is back in session.
Russell Brand’s cross-examination by the prosecution continues.
Russell Brand has denied all the allegations made against him as he took to the witness box to give evidence in his trial at Southwark crown court.
Explore more on these topicsUK news Crime Russell Brand Share Reuse this content Most viewed Most viewed
